Before I get too crazy with this thing, I thought it mightbe a good idea to get a baseline dyno pull. So I pulled off the Roto-Fab CAI and headed down to Straightline Performance this morning. Right off the expressway and onto the dyno rollers, here's the results :
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Baseline dyno pull results
Collapse
X
-
NICE! Lookin good! Can't wait to see ur gains after any and all work you do!CLICK THE LINK!-----> 2nd Annual Central IL Camaro Meet AND Drag Day---May 21st <-----CLICK THE LINK!
-
Originally posted by Dave_O View PostNICE! Lookin good! Can't wait to see ur gains after any and all work you do!
Originally posted by DarkSS View PostThose are good #'s
Originally posted by TonyNo View PostForgive me if I have it wrong, but, I thought manuals had the best efficiency at 85%? This seems to show 90%?
Comment
-
Mike ?
am I reading this correctly? 391 rwhp bone stock on a Mustang Dyno?
We have had many LS3 cars on our dyno all making 370ish rwhp. The 391 rwhp on a MD would be like 410 rwhp on a DJ.
I do not mean to bring down your post, but something doesn't seem right.
maybe it's a freak as you noted and if so congrats :good:97 Z/28 396, LT1 H/I, LE HR cam, FLT Level 7 w/ Yank SS3600, S60 w/ 3.73, UMI, BMR, Nitrous Outlet
10.62@126 NA / 1.40 60ft
9.67@138 N20 200 / 1.31 60ft
GM High Tech cover car April 2009
Follow us on Facebook for Project updates and Exclusive Specials
facebook.com/SpeedIncUSA
www.speedinc.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by Larry@Speed Inc. View PostMike ?
am I reading this correctly? 391 rwhp bone stock on a Mustang Dyno?
We have had many LS3 cars on our dyno all making 370ish rwhp. The 391 rwhp on a MD would be like 410 rwhp on a DJ.
I do not mean to bring down your post, but something doesn't seem right.
maybe it's a freak as you noted and if so congrats :good:
Yup you are in fact reading it correctly....I was thinking it was going to pull around 370 as well.
For shits and giggles I'd be willing to strap it down to a dynojet to see what it turns there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DarkSS View PostMaybe GM accidentally let a 2011 slip out the door?:theyareontome:
It could just be the dyno as well....they didn't seem too amazed at what it put down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by huggerorange73 View PostHey Larry,
Yup you are in fact reading it correctly....I was thinking it was going to pull around 370 as well.
For shits and giggles I'd be willing to strap it down to a dynojet to see what it turns there.
We can make that happen:hello:97 Z/28 396, LT1 H/I, LE HR cam, FLT Level 7 w/ Yank SS3600, S60 w/ 3.73, UMI, BMR, Nitrous Outlet
10.62@126 NA / 1.40 60ft
9.67@138 N20 200 / 1.31 60ft
GM High Tech cover car April 2009
Follow us on Facebook for Project updates and Exclusive Specials
facebook.com/SpeedIncUSA
www.speedinc.com
Comment
-
Be interesting to see the results on the DJ...however, the car now has a CAI and an axle back on it. No longer an apples to apples comparision.
I have confirmed that the dyno was in fact accurate...several other cars went on after mine that day with nuts on readings.
With regards to the graph results off from the cover sheet...the cover sheet is usually always a little higher because it uses SAE standards for correction, where as the graph uses raw data.
Comment
Comment